Time = Dollars ($$$)
With the advent of Tumescent liposuction, and subsequent addition to the procedure of the cosmetic laser, a whole new set of possibilities and variables emerged. The physician still had to first infusion the area to be treated, accounting for ten (10%) to twenty (20%) of labor. The next step - ensuring that the unwanted fat is melted for removal - is even more intensive. This alone could account for thirty (30%) to over fifty (50%) percent of the procedure. The final application - the systematic removal of treated fat - is nearly as resource consuming. Depending on skin tone, location and quantity ... this process could account for another forty (30%) to sixty (60%) percent of procedure costs through labor. With this method, profits are not being maximized.
Let Millennium Medical Technologies show you the
Light at the end of the rainbow…

One of the early pioneers in the thought process was Robert Keller. Doctor Keller of Monterey, California was fortunate to work with MMT in the development of a specialty handle that would eventually allow the physician to combine the two most tedious aspects of Laser Liposuction into one process.
Doctor Keller asked MMT: “Can you make a handle that would allow me to Laser and Aspirate with out having to continually alternate modalities.” MMT responded: “That is what I do. I turn Ideas into reality.” Several weeks later MMT provided the first prototype “SFG” (Suction Fiber Guide) and began testing.
IT WORKED!
Several variations on the original cannula design were manufactured and tested. Version 2009-X is our latest model, and has exceeded customer goals.

Today a physician can cut their operation time down dramatically with these Patented Devices!
This is only one of the advantages to the “SFG”. By allowing the physicians to complete an area they can better judge total cosmetic results, thus getting much more symmetrical results.
Lastly, by removing the super heated FAT, the chance of potentially damaging burn sites should be greatly reduced (resulting in a reduced chance of seroma).
1, 2, 3 & 4 the patient and doctor both Win!